Just wondering here - how exactly can we trust a journal that is partially paid for by advertising provided by major pharmaceutical companies to be less likely to suppress scientific information than a journal paid for by the government?
I'm also rather enjoying the fact that PRISM got caught using watermarked images from Getty and Corbis - and I'm not going to ascribe incompetence in using the wrong images, I suspect they just pinched them. And, as others have pointed out, possibly just photoshopped them out when spotted - the hex info from the Getty file shows "Adobe Photoshop 7.02007:08:27 22:06:26".
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment